next up previous
Next: Self-Organization Up: Self-Organization of Orientation Maps Previous: Introduction

The Receptive Field LISSOM (RF-LISSOM) model

Figure 1: The RF-LISSOM model. The lateral excitatory and lateral inhibitory connections of a single neuron in the network are shown, together with its afferent connections. The afferents form a local anatomical receptive field on the retina.

The simulations are based on the RF-LISSOMgif model of cortical self-organization [37,38,41,42]. The cortical architecture has been simplified and reduced to the minimum necessary configuration to account for the observed phenomena. Because the focus is on the two-dimensional organization of the cortex, each ``neuron'' in the model corresponds to a vertical column of cells through the six layers of the cortex. The transformations in the LGN were also bypassed for simplicity.

The cortical network is modeled with a sheet of interconnected neurons (figure 1). Through afferent connections, each neuron receives input from a receptive surface, or ``retina''. In addition, each neuron has reciprocal excitatory and inhibitory lateral connections with other neurons. Lateral excitatory connections are short-range, connecting only close neighbors. Lateral inhibitory connections run for long distances, and may implement close to full connectivity between neurons in the network.

Neurons receive afferent connections from broad overlapping patches on the retina called anatomical RFs. The network is projected on the retina of receptors, and each neuron is assigned a square region of receptors of side s centered on this location as its RF. Depending on its location, the number of afferents to a neuron could vary from (at the corners) to (at the center).

The inputs to the network consist of simple images of multiple elongated Gaussian spots on the retinal receptors. The activity of receptor inside a spot is given by


where and specify the length along the major and minor axes of the Gaussian, specifies its orientation (chosen randomly from the uniform distribution in the range ), and (,): specifies its center. The elongated Gaussian spots approximate natural visual stimuli after the edge detection and enhancement mechanisms in the retina.

Both afferent and lateral connections have positive synaptic weights. The weights are initially set to random values, and organized through an unsupervised learning process. At each training step, neurons start out with zero activity. An elongated pattern is introduced on the retina, and the activation propagates through the afferent connections to the cortical network. The initial response of neuron is calculated as a weighted sum of the retinal activations:


where is the activation of a retinal receptor within the receptive field of the neuron, is the corresponding afferent weight, and is a piecewise linear approximation of the familiar sigmoid activation function.

The response evolves over time through lateral interaction. At each time step, each cortical neuron combines the above afferent activation with its lateral excitation and inhibition:


where is the excitatory lateral connection weight on the connection from neuron to neuron , is the inhibitory connection weight, and is the activity of neuron during the previous time step. In other words, the retinal activity stays constant while the cortical response settles. The scaling factors and determine the strength of the lateral excitatory and inhibitory interactions. The activity pattern starts out diffuse and spread over a substantial part of the map, and converges iteratively into stable focused patches of activity, or activity bubbles.

After the activity has settled, typically in a few iterations of equation 3, the connection weights of each neuron are modified. Both afferent and lateral weights adapt according to the same mechanism: the Hebb rule, normalized so that the sum of the weights is constant:


where stands for the activity of the neuron in the settled activity bubble, is the afferent or the lateral connection weight (, or ), is the learning rate for each type of connection ( for afferent weights, for excitatory, and for inhibitory) and is the presynaptic activity ( for afferent, for lateral). Afferent inputs, lateral excitatory inputs, and lateral inhibitory inputs are normalized separately.

Both inhibitory and excitatory lateral connections follow the same Hebbian learning process and strengthen by correlated activity. At long distances, very few neurons have correlated activity and therefore most long-range connections eventually become weak. The weak connections are eliminated periodically, and through the weight normalization, inhibition concentrates in a closer neighborhood of each neuron. The radius of the lateral excitatory interactions starts out large, but as self-organization progresses, it is decreased until it covers only the nearest neighbors. Such a decrease is necessary for global topographic order to develop and for the receptive fields to become well-tuned at the same time (for theoretical motivation for this process, see [26,27,28,33,42]; for neurobiological evidence, see [9,20].) Together the pruning of lateral connections and decreasing excitation range produce activity bubbles that are gradually more focused and local. As a result, weights change in smaller neighborhoods, and receptive fields become better tuned to local areas of the retina.

next up previous
Next: Self-Organization Up: Self-Organization of Orientation Maps Previous: Introduction