next up previous
Next: Postscript Up: Synchronous Oscillations Based on Previous: Why Local Connections?

Discussion

This chapter elucidates a mechanism for reaching emergent synchrony in a network of oscillators by only local connections. There are two main parts to this mechanism: (1) a more detailed, possibly more plausible, oscillator model is used; (2) The dynamic normalization principle (Equation 2) to ensure the equal weight condition for the communication among the oscillators. Dynamic normalization provides a quantitative procedure for the idea of dynamic links, which has been argued to be neurally plausible (see von der Malsburg [62], Crick [12]). Based on this mechanism, the simulation results of synchronous oscillations in the visual cortex well match the corresponding experimental results. We note that the models of Sporns et al. [56], König and Schillen [34], Wilson and Bower [73], and Chawanya et al. [10] can also simulate the experimental results based on local coupling. Our model differs from Sporns et al. [56,57], Wilson and Bower [73], and Chawanya et al. [10] in that we provide a general mechanism of reaching global synchronization based on local connections. As stated in the introduction, the model of König and Schillen [34] relies on specific delay relations to obtain phase synchronization, while ours does not.

Perhaps more importantly, we consider synchronous oscillations based on local connections represent a significant step towards solving engineering problems of scene segmentation and figure/ground segregation. Although a number of attempts have been made to use neural oscillations for solving the problem of sensory segmentation [4,43,55,64,63], the progress in general is very limited and does not meet people's expectations (see [62]). We think that the lack of a local mechanism has been one of the major difficulties to be overcome before neural oscillations can play a significant role in machine pattern analysis.

The network architecture illustrated in the Why Local ... lays a ground for a novel approach to neural scene segmentation. The permanent connection pattern ('s of (4)) of the network defines the innate architecture, which is simple and sufficiently general. Dynamic connections ('s) are formed on the basis of the permanent connections and current input patterns. Synchronous oscillations make the result of segmentation readily utilizable - a simple threshold function would do the job. The neighborhood connectivity pattern preserves the geometrical structures of the objects. If one allows lateral connections beyond nearest neighbors or adds more layered structures of the network, both the capability and the flexibility of scene segmentation should be markedly enhanced. These features are very attractive compared to the traditional approach of image segmentation, where edge detection is followed by contour detection and then a process of labeling different regions based on closed contours, among other heuristics [17,25,49]. The approach offered here directly operates on objects, without the detour of detecting contours from regions and then forming regions based on contours, often an ambiguous process.

Of course, scene segmentation involves many issues other than the separation of connected regions, such as segmentation based on depth (see Murata and Shimizu [43], for an interesting handling by synchronous oscillations), occlusion, intersection, and so on. Although its eventual applicability to segmentation must be judged by future research, the basic principle of the approach introduced here, namely, the emergent properties from local communications, will be, we believe, a fundamental part of a successful system of real-time scene understanding.


next up previous
Next: Postscript Up: Synchronous Oscillations Based on Previous: Why Local Connections?